About the ERA...

Unregulated gun rights are said to be protected constitutional rights for white men. 
Basic rights for women, however, remain unprotected constitutionally.

Congress passed this and a bunch of states ratified it, though Phyllis Schlafly mobilized the religious right and brought things to a halt in 1977 or so, well before the 1982 deadline.

Yes, this podcast again! Unladylike, Episode 20 is awesome. 
Know your rights... Like the song, but know that you have none.... https://unladylike.co/episodes/020/equal-rights-amendment

This is a very good look at the Equal Rights Amendment - link above. Don't miss it. It has RBG talking about why it's necessary.

Women feel more empowered and there are more laws than there used to be, but our rights are not secured as long as the ERA is OUT.

The women who do this show have really perfect imagery for this. Two quotes from the episode. Not edited for perfection, but I think I got most of it.

"Think of the ERA as an IUD for your rights. As Dr. Ruth describes, an ERA safely inserted into the Constitution would provide effective long lasting protection from unplanned politics."

I love this analogy. They just keep it rolling throughout.

"Existing laws that we have - the Violence Against Women Act, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, the Equal Pay Act - they're basically the equivalent of condoms. When used properly and consistently, they work pretty well. They're definitely better than nothing. But also like condoms, those laws often aren't applied uniformly, if at all and that can leave us vulnerable to changing political attitudes in a way that getting that Constitutional IUD just wouldn't."

All kinds of resources on the ERA:
https://www.equalrightsamendment.org

This was on the Google search page for the Alice Paul Institute site above, but I couldn't really find it on the website so this is a summary that may or may not be on the new site:

"The ERA in the States. The Equal Rights Amendment was passed by Congress on March 22, 1972 and sent to the states for ratification. In order to be added to the Constitution, it needed approval by legislatures in three-fourths (38) of the 50 states. By 1977, the legislatures of 35 states had approved the amendment."


Two states - Nevada and Illinois ratified it within the past two years, reigniting the fight for officially recognized rights for women:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44319712

Thirteen mostly southern states haven't ratified and several stated rescinded, complicating the issue. The 1982 deadline has some dismissing the ERA, but this article mentions the 27th amendment about salaries for Congress that wasn't ratified until 100 years later, so there's a good argument for ignoring the deadline.

Antisemitism or media bias?

Antisemitism or media bias?

No, I'm not asking this in general, so please don't take the gloves off yet. Relax. There has been a specific controversy lately and very little pushback on a large scale. There was an excellent discussion on this in the FB group for a podcast I love, Radio Dispatch, they considered the charge and as new facts were brought to light, people didn't double down on the original position or throw around baseless personal attacks, which was refreshing and productive.


NYT smear piece: https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/06/27/opinion/im-glad-the-dyke-march-banned-jewish-stars.html


Another, rather worse, smear piece I became aware of through a supposedly liberal organization online:

http://time.com/4839592/anti-semitism-lgbtq-pride/?xid=homepage
Always a good resource, here's what Mondoweiss had to say on the whole thing:
Anti-Semitism accusations against ‘Dyke March’ prove pro-Israel lobby will torch LGBT rights for marginalized peoplehttp://mondoweiss.net/2017/07/semitism-disproved-accounts/


This TIME article is particularly bad because it is not only devoid of facts, but also makes wild baseless accusations. First, it asserts that Jews were denied expressing their intersection of religion and sexuality, which is false - others with stars of David on shirts, signs and flags were welcomed and not ejected. Which begs the question, what did these three individuals do differently?


Greenblatt of the ADL in the TIME piece pointed to these things as examples of intolerance

Last summer, a plank in the platform of the Movement for Black Lives bizarrely accused Israel of genocide.
Linda Sarsour, a leader of the women’s rights movement, has lambasted Zionism as incompatible with feminism and advocates for the exclusion of pro-Israel Jews from activist groups. And some in the anti-Israel movement have accused Israel of “pink-washing,” claiming that Israel and its supporters celebrate freedoms enjoyed by the LGBTQ community in Israel to divert attention from Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians.

Genocide? Bizzare? It's a frequent consideration due to the indiscriminate use of deadly force and talk of "demographic threats." Here's one example of Holocaust survivors' concern for Israel's genocidal tendencies:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/holocaust-survivors-and-their-descendants-accuse-israel-of-genocide-9687994.html

The TIME piece ends by saying they, the ADL,". . . demand that our allies observe those fundamental values that we also seek to live by: equality, fairness and respect for all."


This is a noble goal, but when you try and whitewash history and ignore Palestinian suffering at the hands of the oppressed turned oppressor, you are no longer heading in the general direction of these ideals; you're going the opposite direction.

Zionism is to many, by definition, a colonial and genocidal undertaking. Maybe we need to be asking what do YOU mean by Zionism? What do you mean by a Jewish homeland? The right simply to exist in peace with equal representation such that all peoples' rights are protected? Great! Or do you mean the right to exist as a Jewish entity protecting Jewish rights, thereby necessitating the ethnic cleansing of another group, namely Palestinians? The right to continue the Occupation until a (suitable to you) government emerges from the rubble of the starved open air prison you created? When a person objects to Zionism, you cannot charge antisemitism automatically.

A few notes and facts can be found in the links to the official statements of several groups below, facts which are missing in the TIME and NYT articles that only seem to quote one woman who was kicked out and no other witnesses or organizers or Palestinian groups that may have been involved to make this grand pronouncement of antisemitism. From what I gathered, one or all of the three ejected were members (one was a director, possibly?) of A Wider Bridge, a problematic organization in support of various IDF actions against Palestinians that go against the anti-colonial position of the March and violate human rights more broadly. They weren't just there as LGBTQ Jews, they were loudly anti-Palestinian and increasingly belligerent when asked to be respectful of the March's aims and others marching.

Chicago Dyke March Collective's statement:
https://chicagodykemarchcollective.org/2017/06/27/chicago-dyke-march-official-statement-on-2017-march-and-solidarity-with-palestine/

JVP statement:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VG2cPkufLCFVSv4DmvRbOSQnzMdUt7so8AlrQHcXSyA/pub If Not Now statement:
https://www.facebook.com/notes/ifnotnow-chicago/ifnotnow-chicago-statement-on-the-chicago-dyke-march/1160560540756467/



More on A Wider Bridge and why these individuals as opposed to other Jewish participants were asked to leave:
https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/chicago-dyke-march-accuser-wider-bridge-has-record-fabrications


Among problems with A Wider Bridge are (from EI article above):

+ In 2016: https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/israel-advocates-falsely-claim-chicago-lgbtq-protest-disrupted-jewish-prayers

+ "In 2014, A Wider Bridge sponsored rallies addressed by Israeli government officials in support of Israel’s 51-day bombing campaign that devastated the Gaza Strip and left 2,200 Palestinians – more than 550 of them children– dead."

 + And at the March-  "the altering of chants to erase the word “Palestine,”" among other things.

+ In general- "A key goal of Israel and its lobby groups in recent years has been to inoculate Israel against criticism by obscuring the line between anti-Jewish bigotry, on the one hand, and criticism of Israel and its state ideology Zionism, on the other."